In the Court of Appeals of the State of Illinois Melissa Porter vs Research Paper

In the Court of Appeals of the State of Illinois Melissa Porter vs John Straub - Research Paper Example On November 14, 2011, the District Court ruled in her favor. There was no Motion to Modify Child Support filed by either party. However, the District Court Judge made an Order of Child Support. Pursuant to that Order, the Judge allowed for a deviation from the child support guidelines to accommodate Mr. Straub’s new child, born of his current marriage. There is no Order of Support for that child. There was nothing in the Order addressing unpaid support. STATEMENT OF THE FACTS In October 2011, Melissa Porter sought to regain custody of her son, David, from the child’s father, John Straub. There was an order of Paternity, Custody and Support entered in a Florida court in 2008. Pursuant to that Order, Mr. Straub was ordered to pay $100 per month in child support. His payment history was poor and he was in arrears when Ms. Porter found it necessary to join the Army Reserves to supplement her income in order to properly care for the child. Ms. Porter and Mr. Straub had a ver bal agreement that he would care for his son while Ms. Porter completed Basic Training in the Army Reserves. Mr. Straub was ten months in arrears in his child support obligation at the time he began caring for his son in August 2010. Ms. Porter was injured in a training accident while on active duty and spent several months recovering. Upon her return home, she sought the return of the child and Mr. Straub refused. Mr. Straub filed for custody in the Illinois courts. That filing resulted in an Order granting custody to Mr. Straub. Ms. Porter filed for an Order to Vacate that finding and the District Court for Cook County found in her favor, returning her son to her. During the course of those proceedings, the District Court made a support order, allowing a 20% deduction from the Illinois child support guideline amount to accommodate Mr. Straub’s new child of his current marriage. There was no provision for paying the arrearage. There was no inclusion for the income of Mr. Str aub’s current spouse when calculating the total net income upon which the support amount should be based, nor was there a finding on the record of the guideline amount upon which the deduction would be based. When Ms. Porter objected, the judge instructed the parties to â€Å"take it up on appeal.† Appellant now appeals from the Order Modifying Support. ARGUMENT The facts of the case are not in dispute. All parties were present when the District Court judge modified the child support order to accommodate Mr. Straub’s parental obligation to his new child of his current marriage. The judge deducted 20% from the guideline amount without stating an initial child support guideline amount and the factors at law that allowed him to vary from the statutory guidelines. I. Standard of Review Of the issue presented here on appeal, the standard of review is de novo because there is no dispute as to the facts and the issue is a question of law. In re Marriage of Baumgartner, 393 Ill. App. 3d 297; 912 N.E.2d 783 (2009). See also Einstein v. Nijim, 358 Ill. App. 3d 263, 831 N.E.2d 50 (2005). A judgment is contrary to law â€Å"when an opposite conclusion is apparent or when findings appear to be unreasonable, arbitrary, or not based on evidence.†

Electric motors Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Electric motors - Essay Example (i) DC Motor: This motor uses a DC current. An armature is placed between magnetic poles, known as field poles. Field poles remain stationary and provide the static magnetic field which runs from North Pole to South Pole. The armature is mounted on bearing and there is winding of conduction wire on it. When a DC current is made to pass through the windings on the armature, it becomes an electromagnet and the interaction between the pole magnet and the armature electromagnet forces the armature to turn until North and South poles of the two magnets align. Once this happens direction of the current in the armature windings is reversed to switch the North and South poles using a Commutator and thus the armature keeps on rotating [2]. (ii) AC Motor: It consists of a Stator and a Rotor as shown in Fig. 1 [3]. As implies by the name Stator is the stationary component. It consists of number of magnetic poles arranged in a cylindrical symmetry around the rotating component or the Rotor. As a n AC current passes through the Rotor, it experiences a torque which rotates it and this rotation is coupled to external load through a suitable drive mechanism. Fig. 1: Schematic Diagram Showing Parts of an AC Motor [3] (iii) Servo Motor: It is primarily a DC motor, but is much more refined one. It consists of a sensor to sense position of the shaft and used this as feedback to control speed of the DC motor [4]. Q1. (b) (i) Applications of Motors DC motor: It is much easier to control speed in case of DC motors and therefore, these motors are preferred for applications where speed control is very important. Computer disc drive is one very important application of DC motor. AC motor: It is inexpensive; however, the speed control is not good. One typical application of an AC motor is to drive fans where speed control is not so critical. Servo Motor: It is feedback controlled system and hence it is used for applications which need precise position and speed control. One such applicati on is drive for CNC stage, where control of position and speed is very critical. Q1. (b) (ii) Speed Control DC Motor: In a DC motor the back electromagnetic force and torque is given by the following equations. Back electromagnetic force: E = K?N Torque: T = K?Ia Where: E = electromagnetic force developed at armature terminal (volt) ? = field flux which is directly proportional to field current N = speed in RPM (revolutions per minute) T = electromagnetic torque Ia = armature current K = an equation constan Therefore, speed of DC motors can be controlled by controlling either armature voltage or field current. AC Motor: Control of speed is difficult for AC motors. Speed of a synchronous AC motor is given by the following equation [5]. Ns = 120 f / P Where: f = frequency of the supply frequency P= number of poles It can however, be controlled by using variable frequency drive, because speed of an AC motor can be controlled by controlling frequency of AC supply only. Servo Motor: It i s a DC motor only so speed can be controlled in the same manner as in case of a DC motor. It uses a feedback system to control its speed. Q1. (b) (iii) Two Limitations DC Motor: Power is limited due to difficulty in commutation at high size. This limits application of DC motors for high power applications. Besides, there can be sparks from the commutator especially at higher powers. Therefore, a DC motor cannot be used in hazardous and fire prone areas. AC Motor: Speed control is more difficult. Cannot be